Wow. Anyone else find it simply hilarious that Big Brother is a product of the staunch, anti-government, radical conservatives?
I'm not suprised, though. I always knew y'all were just a bunch of authoritarians who wanted to be on top and couldn't stand having someone else get in your way.
The US government is developing a massive computer system that can collect huge amounts of data and, by linking far-flung information from blogs and e-mail to government records and intelligence reports, search for patterns of terrorist activity.
The system - parts of which are operational, parts of which are still under development - is already credited with helping to foil some plots. It is the federal government's latest attempt to use broad data-collection and powerful analysis in the fight against terrorism. But by delving deeply into the digital minutiae of American life, the program is also raising concerns that the government is intruding too deeply into citizens' privacy.
...
A major part of ADVISE involves data-mining - or "dataveillance," as some call it. It means sifting through data to look for patterns. If a supermarket finds that customers who buy cider also tend to buy fresh-baked bread, it might group the two together. To prevent fraud, credit-card issuers use data-mining to look for patterns of suspicious activity.
What sets ADVISE apart is its scope. It would collect a vast array of corporate and public online information - from financial records to CNN news stories - and cross-reference it against US intelligence and law-enforcement records. The system would then store it as "entities" - linked data about people, places, things, organizations, and events, according to a report summarizing a 2004 DHS conference in Alexandria, Va. The storage requirements alone are huge - enough to retain information about 1 quadrillion entities, the report estimated. If each entity were a penny, they would collectively form a cube a half-mile high - roughly double the height of the Empire State Building.
....
Some computer scientists support the concepts behind ADVISE."This sort of technology does protect against a real threat," says Jeffrey Ullman, professor emeritus of computer science at Stanford University. "If a computer suspects me of being a terrorist, but just says maybe an analyst should look at it ... well, that's no big deal. This is the type of thing we need to be willing to do, to give up a certain amount of privacy."
Yes. For the children.
Anyways, hope you are wearing clean underwear.

Anyways, hope you are wearing clean underwear.
**********************************************
Not anymore.
Yea, there is that reaction. Still, not going to matter much. Everyone looks naked when you know the world's address.
Ullmann is a DB expert among computer scientists(he's better known for compiler theory, obviously)... so his stance is at least understandable. The power of databases is addictive, tantalizing, erotic. All that data, all the possible relationships, polyhedra and parallel planes - very tempting. Tempting to use, and to excuse the use.
Something about power and responsibility....