Oldies but goodies

| 2 Comments

George H.W. Bush in his book A World Transformed (Alfred A. Knopf, NY, 1998): on page 489:

Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in "mission creep" and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Further more, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different -- and perhaps barren -- outcome.

-- George H.W. Bush in A World Transformed

[emphasis, mine]

2 Comments

I quote that one on my blog every couple of months. Its prescience is astounding, and rasies my estimation of George the Elder somewhat. Then again, compared to George the Younger, most former presidents look pretty good.

Remember this? Originally in the Onion just before the invasion.

Holy crap! I've been looking for that forever! Man, thanks a zillion.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Azael published on June 10, 2005 6:26 AM.

Stereotomy was the previous entry in this blog.

FLAs is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.